LATE ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC EXPANSION OF A CONGENITAL ESOPHAGEAL STENOSIS. CHILD HOSPITAL MANUEL ASCENClO VILLARROEL, 2013 A CASE REPORT

Authors

  • Jorge Enrique Tejada Aldazosa
  • Luis Gonzalo Melean Camacho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v10i23.555

Keywords:

Congenital esophageal stenosis, Fibromuscular hypertrophy, Esophageal perforation, Expansion

Abstract

lt was analyzed a two years and two months old patient with congenital esophageal stenosis diagnosed three months before admission to Children ls Hospital Manuel Ascencio Villarroel, in 2013, with the aim of identifying the management of congenital esophageal stenosis and its complications.

The patient presented dysphagia to solids and semi-solids before endoscopic procedures: cough, fever, chest pain, difficult breathing and dilation cyanosis after the last esophageal.

Laboratory studies and auxiliary diagnostic methods were conducted such as: esophageal endoscopy; esophageal dilations; CBC; urine culture; CXR; purulent fluid culture of pleural cavity and esophagogram. The studies showed a late diagnosis confirmed by endoscopy. The treatment of stenosis with endoscopic dilatation was performed under general anesthesia; drilling esophagus posterior to the last endoscopy expansion.

In the outpatient consultation a urinalysis was conducted whose results were: +++ leukocytes, proteins +, positive nitrites. Microscopic examination: epithelial cells per field 2-4, abundant leukocytes, erythrocytes 0 to 1 per field, abundant bacterial flora pyocytes 1-3 per field. Similarly a urine culture was performed which resulted in: colonies> 100,000 CFU / ml, germ E. coli identified sensitive Sulfatrimetropin, Gentamicin, Norfloxacin, third generation cephalosporins. These results could be attributed thermal spikes.

Controversy persists in deciding which the best suitable initial treatment for esophageal stenosis box is: either a surgical operation or conservative management with endoscopic esophageal dilations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

SHIGERU T, CHIKARA T, NARUAKI M ET AL. Congenital esophageal stenosis: therapeutic strategy based on etiology. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 197-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.30254

JONES WG ll, GINSBERG RJ. Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg

SARR MG, PEMBERTON JH, PAYNE WS. Management of instrumental perforations of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84: 211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39035-X

RUIZ F, GUZMÁN S, SHARP A, TAPIA A, LLANOS O, IBÁÑEZ L. Perforaciones esofágicas. Rev Chil Cir 1995; 47(1): 56 - 60.

BARRIENTOS F, BAQUERIZO A, MUÑOZ W. Perforación esofágica. Rev Chil Cir 1998; 50(5): 509 512.

BAEZA C, GARCÍA CABELLO L, GARCÍA CHÁVEZ J. Perforación esofágica en niños. Cir & Cir 1998; 66(1): 16- 20.

SANJEEV A, FARAZ K., HANMIN L, ET AL. Management of congenital esophageal stenosis. J Pediatr surg 2002; 37: 1024-1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.33834

KOUCHI K, YOSHIDA H, MATSUNAGA T, ET AL. Endosonographic Evaluation in two children with esophageal stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 934-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.32921

MOGHISSI K, PENDER D: Instrumental perforations of oesophagus and their management. Thorax 43:642, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.43.8.642

PANIERI E, MILLAR AJW, RODE H ET AL: Iatrogenic esophageal perforation in children: Patterns of injury, presentation, management, and outcome. J Pediatr Surg 31 :890-895, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(96)90404-2

Published

2015-04-30

How to Cite

Tejada Aldazosa, J. E., & Melean Camacho , L. G. (2015). LATE ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC EXPANSION OF A CONGENITAL ESOPHAGEAL STENOSIS. CHILD HOSPITAL MANUEL ASCENClO VILLARROEL, 2013 A CASE REPORT. Revista De Investigación E Información En Salud, 10(23), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v10i23.555

Issue

Section

Case Report