Effectiveness of Tanaka Johnston's analysis in a certain population of Jalisco (Mexico) 2010-2015.

Authors

  • María Fernanda Gutiérrez-Rojo
  • Jaime Fabián Gutiérrez Rojo
  • Jaime Gutiérrez Villaseñor
  • Alma Rosa Rojas García

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v12i30.510

Keywords:

Tanaka Johnston method, Mixed dentition, Malocclusion

Abstract

The mixed dentition analysis Tanaka Johnston is used for orthodontic diagnosis, however this analysis can perform improper diagnosis because of differences in population's dental sizes. The Universe was 425 studied models orthodontic pretreatment study, the sample size was calculated and the result was 123 study models. The lower incisors, canines and premolars maxillary and mandibular models mesiodistally study measured the mixed dentition analysis of Tanaka and Johnston was applied. For data collection the Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and statistical program was held at the Stat Calc program was used. Statistically significant differences between calculated with the equation of Tanaka Johnston values and the values of the canines and premolars were found maxilla and mandible. It was moderate positive correlation between the predicted values and the values of the study population. Analysis of Tanaka Johnston is not effective for use in the study population because overestimates the values of the canine and premolars of the maxilla and mandible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ECHARRI P. Tratamiento ortodóncico y ortopédico de 1 a fase de dentición mixta. Madrid. 2da edición. 2010. 84-7

GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO J, ROJAS-GARCÍA A. Ajuste y evaluación de las constantes de regresión lineal para el análisis de dentición mixta. Acta Odontológica Colombiana. 2013; 3 (1): 31-37.

GUPTA M, BAHL R, GIRDHAR P, KUMAR M. Mixed dentition analysis. Asia Pacific Dental Journal. 2015; 2 (2): 24-27.

PROFFIT W. Ortodoncia Teoría y Práctica. St. Luois. 4a edición. Mosby. 2007. 197-201.

RAKOSI T, JONAS l. Atlas de Ortopedia maxilar: diagnóstico. Editorial Masson. 1992. Barcelona. 219-221

MOYERS R. Manual de Ortodoncia. Buenos Aires. Cuarta Edición. 1998. Panamericana. 237-42.

PROFFIT W, ACKERMAN J. Capítulo 6. Diagnóstico ortodóncico: establecimiento de un listado de problemas. en: Proffit W. White R. Sarver D. Contemporary treatment of Dentofacial Deformity. Mosby 2003. 148 y 168.

GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO J, ROJAS-GARCÍA A, LEMUS-FLORES C, REYES-MALDONADO Y. Ajuste por género del análisis de Tanaka Johnston en la predicción del tamaño mesiodistal de premolares y caninos en una población de Nayarit. Revista ORAL. 2012; 13 (41). 870-872.

TANAKA M, JOHNSTON L. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Den Assoc. 1974; 88:798-801.

AQUINO C, TIRRE M, OLIVEIRA A. Applicability of Three tooth size prediction Methods for White Brazilians. Angle Orthodontist. 2006; 76

BERWANI A, FIDA M. Development of prediction equation for the mixed dentition in a Pakistani simple. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 201 1; 140: 626-32.

BOBOC A, Dibbets J. Prediction of the mesiodistal width of unerupted permanent canines and premolars: A statistical approach. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 503-7.

CABELLO N, MENDOZA V, PARÉS F. Valoraciön de la exactitud de predicci6n del tamaho dental mesiodistal de las tablas de probabilidad de Moyers y las ecuaciones de Tanaka Johnston en una poblaci6n mexicana. Revista ADM. 2004; XLI (5): 176-82.

TELEBI V, MAHMOOD H, GAHANI H. An investigation to determine the validity of Tanaka Johnston method for estimating the mesi odistal with of permanent canine and premolars in sample population of Ghazvin city. Journal of Dentistry. 2003; 16 (2):53-59

BHERWANI A, FIDA M. Development of a prediction equation for the mixed dentition in Pakistani sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 201 1; 140: 626-32.

JUNEJA S, MAHAJAN N, KAUR H, GUPTA K, SUKHIJA M, BHAMBRE E. Comparative evaluation of three mixed dentition analyses and formulation of regression equations for north Indian population: a cross-sectional study. Biomed J. 2015; 38 (5): http://biomedj.org/temp/ BiomedJ385450-7435327_203913.pdf

LEE-CHAN S, JACOBSON B, CHWA K, JACOBSON R. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian Americans. Am J Dentofacial Orthop. 1 998; 1 1 3:2939.

BUGAOGHIS l, KARANTH D, ELMOUADEB H. Mixed dentition analysis in Libyan schoolchildren. Journal of Orthodontic Science. 2013; 2 (4): 1 15-9.

Arslan S, Dildes N, Kama J, Genc C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod. 2009; 10: 135-40.

Al Bitar Z, Al Omar l, Sonbol H, Al Ahmad H, Hamdan A. Mixed Dentition Analysis in a Jordanian Population. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78 (4): 670-5.

Kuswandari S, Nishino M, Arita K, Abe Y. Mixed dentition space analysis for indonesian Javanese children. Pediatric Dental Journal. 2006; 16 (1): 74-83.

Hammand S, Abdellatif A. Mixed dentition space analysis in Egyptian children. Pediatric Dental Journal. 201 0; 20 (2):1 15-121.

Botero P, Cuesta D, Agudelo S, Hincapie C, Ramirez C. Valoraciön de los métodos de anålisis de denticiön mixta de Moyers y TanakaJohnston, en la predicciön del diåmetro mesiodistal de caninos y premolares no erupcionados. Rev Facultad de Odontologia Universidad Antioquia 2014;25

GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO J, ROJAS-GARCIA A, LEMUS-FLORES C, REYES-MALDONADO Y. Efectividad del Anålisis de Tanaka Johnston en una poblaciån de Nayarit. Revista Oral. 201 1; 12 (39): 795-8.

DURAN-PADILLA G, GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO J, MONTIEL-MILONAS R. Validaciön del anålisis de Tanaka Johnston en una poblaciön de Aguascalientes. Memoria del XLVII congreso de la Asociaciön Mexicana de Ortodoncia 2014. Concurso de estudiantes de postgrado.

Published

2017-08-30

How to Cite

Gutiérrez-Rojo, M. F., Gutiérrez Rojo, J. F., Gutiérrez Villaseñor, J., & Rojas García, A. R. (2017). Effectiveness of Tanaka Johnston’s analysis in a certain population of Jalisco (Mexico) 2010-2015. Revista De Investigación E Información En Salud, 12(30), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v12i30.510

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales