Sigle Bond™ Universal and Adper ™ Single Bond 2 adhesives comparison against microfiltration in Class II restorations sealed with Bulk Fill resin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v16i41.148Keywords:
Acid etching, Adhesive systems, Bulk Fill, MicrofiltrationAbstract
Introduction: Adhesive systems are a very important part of oral rehabilitation, which is why the professional must be constantly updated with new information on the most recent products marketed.
Objective: To determine the degree of gingival marginal microfiltration in class II cavities, filled with FiltekTM Bulk Fill resin (single increment), comparing 2 different adhesive systems: the first, the Single BondTM Universal adhesive (self-etching), without acid etching; and the second, the AdperTM Single Bond 2 adhesive, with total acid etching.
Methodology: A prospective, analytical, and cross-sectional study was carried out to show the marginal gingival microfiltration. 25 posterior teeth, molars and premolars were used. 2 standardized class II cavity preparations were made, without an occlusal drawer, located on the proximal faces (mesial-distal), later both preparations were filled with FiltekTM Bulk Fill resin using 2 adhesive systems: the Single BondTM Universal (self-etching), without acid etching and AdperTM Single Bond 2 Adhesive with total acid etching. The samples were subjected to 200 cycles of thermocycling in a 1% methylene blue solution, later they were cut to show marginal microfiltration.
Results: It was demonstrated that using both adhesive systems there was marginal microfiltration; Greater microfiltration was found with the Single BondTM Universal Adhesive (self-etching) with an average of 44,7%; compared to that obtained with the AdperTM Single Bond 2 Adhesive, which had an average microfiltration value of 26%; with microfiltration averages of 1,78 ± 1,25mm and 1,06 ± 1,16mm, respectively. The AdperTM Single Bond 2 adhesive obtained 10 samples out of 25 that did not show any microfiltration, contrasting with 3 samples of 25 without microfiltration, with the Single BondTM Universal adhesive (self-etching).
Conclusion: A difference was found in the degree of marginal microfiltration in favor of the AdperTM Single Bond 2 adhesive system, obtaining this lower percentage compared to the Single Bond Universal adhesive system in its self-etching mode.
Downloads
References
Barrancos Mooney J. Operatoria Dental. Cuarta ed. Varas P, editor. Argentina: Panamericana; 2007.
Iruretagoyena. Salud para todos. [Online]. [cited 2020 Septiembre 15. Available from: https://www.sdpt.net/OPERATORIADENTAL/grabadoacidoesmalte.htm
Freedman G. Revista Dendista y Paciente. [Online].; 2017 [cited 2021 diciembre 1. Available from: https://dentistaypaciente.com/investigacion-clinica-110.html.
Villa Vigil A, Moradas Estrada M. Situación actual de los adhesivos de autograbado: productos existentes, técnica y sistemática de actuación de cada uno. Revista del ilustre consejo general de odontologos y estomatologos de españa. 2020 Febrero.
Caranqui Gomez J. Microfiltración marginal de adhesivos de quinta generación versus adhesivos de sexta generación en restauraciones clase I con resina de nanorelleno, Estudio in vitro. [Online].; 2019 [cited 2020 Julio 1. Available from: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/bitstream/25000/19401/1/T-UCE-0015-ODO-204.pdf.
Castillo Rodriguez J. Nivel de microfiltración marginal en restauraciones clase II de resina compuesta y sistemas adhesivos de autograbado y de grabado total. [Online].; 2010 [cited 2020 Junio 29. Available from: http://www.dspace.unitru.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/UNITRU/9977/CastilloRodriguez_J.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Espinoza T. Analisis comparativo in vitro del grado de microfiltracion marginal de restauraciones de resina compiuesta relizadas utilizando el sistema adhesivo adper single bond 2 con grabado ácido y single bond universal con y sin grabado ácido. Tesis de Grado. Santiago: Universidad de Chile, Odontologia; 2014.
Veintimilla V. Analisis comparativo del nivel de microfiltración marginal entre sistemas adhesivos grabables y autograbables. Estudio in vitro. Tesis de grado. Guayaquil: Universidad de Guayaquil, Facultad de odontología; 2017.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 GABRIEL ANDRE CLAROS JALDIN, Cinthya Fabiola Zamorano Vilar, Liliana Cáceres Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
