Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in Patients of the Especialidad de Ortodoncia of the Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit from 2014 from 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v13i33.497Keywords:
Orthodontic treatment, OrthodonticsAbstract
The orthodontic treatment necessity index was developed in the United Kingdom by Brook and Shaw in 1989. T his index prioritizes and classifies malocclusions according to treatment needs. A descriptive, transversal and observational research was carried out with the objective of determining the degree of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in patients of the Specialty of Orthodontics of the Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit from 2014 to 2017, where 202 orthodontic pretreatment study models were evaluated from the clinic of the university with a Mitutoyo digital caliper, a computer and a Microsoft Office Excel program to tabulate information and perform descriptive statistics. The results shows that in dental health component the average was 2,51 ± 1.07 (84,3 % needed some type of orthodontic treatment). The aesthetic component average was 4,9 ± 2,54 and only 45,61 % needed orthodontics. Regarding the component of dental health, 83,51 % of women and 85,14 % of men needed some type of orthodontic treatment. However with the aesthetic component in women only 44,33 % and 48,65 % in men needed some type of orthodontic treatment. lt is concluded that there is is a greater need for orthodontic treatment when using the dental health component than when using the aesthetic component. Men presented a greater need for orthodontic treatment than women when evaluated with both indexes.
Downloads
References
1. AGUILAR N. y TABOADA O. Frecuencia de malocluciones y su asociación con problemas de postura corporal en una población escolar del Estado de México. Bol Med Hosp lnfant Mex. México; 2013. 70(5):364-37.
2. PINO 1, VÉLIZ O y GARCÍA P. Maloclusiones, según el indice de estética dental en estudiantes de séptimo grado de Santa Clara. Medicent Electrón. Cuba; 2014.18(4):177-9.
3. ALEMÁN M, MARTÍNES I y Pérez A. Índice de estética dental y criterio profesional para determinar la necesidad de tratamiento ortodóntico. Rev Med Electron. Cuba; 2011. 33(3): 271-277.
4. AYALA A, ROJAS A, GUTIÉRREZ J y MATA F. Determinación de la necesidad de tratamiento de ortodoncia en población de Tepic Nayarit, México. Acta Odontológica Colombiana. Colombia; 2014. 4(1): 131-8.
5. ENDARRA L, TANG B y LISA L. Correlation of orthodontic treatment demand with treatment need assessed using two indices, The Angle Orthodontist. United States; 1995. 65 (6): 443-450.
6. BHAGYALAKSHMI A, SHIVALINGA B-M, BALASUBRAMANIAN S y SUMA S. The index of orthodontic treatment need a review. lnternational Journal of Recent Scientific Research. Netherlands; 2015. 6(8): 5835-9.
7. CARDOSO C, DRUMMOND A, LAGES E, PRETTI H, FERREIRA E, ABREU M. The Dental Aesthetic lndex and Dental Health Componen of the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need as Tools in Epidemiological Studies. lnt. J. Enviran. Res. Public Health. Switzerland; 2011. 8: 3277-3286. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083277
8. ELIZONDO R, YUDOVICH M, AGUILAR-M y MELÉNDEZ A. Propuesta de un índice de maloclusiones invalidantes con potencial de deterioro y su aplicación. Rev Odont Mex. México, 2011.15 (2): 77-95.
9. CASTRO C, FERNÁNDEZ M, CARRASCO R, LEZAMA G, VAILLARD E, BARCIELA M. Índices epidemiológicos orales. BUAP. México. 2009:65-69.
10. GUTIÉRREZ M, GUTIÉRREZ J, GUTIÉRREZ J y ROJAS A. Necesidad de tratamiento ortodóntico utilizando el Índice Estética Dental (DAI) en una población de Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Acta Odontológica Colombiana. Colombia; 2016. 6(1): 99-106.
11. PÉREZ V, GARCÍAG, CÁRDENAS G, CARRASCO R, CASTRO C, LEZAMMAG yVAILLARD E. Índice Estética Dental (DAI) y necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico en escolares, verano 2007. Oral. México; 2008. 9 (29):472-5.
12. DEGUCHI T, HONJO T, FUKUNAGA T, MIYAWAKI S, ROBERTS W y TAKANO T. Clinical assessment of orthodontic outcomes with the peer assessment rating, discrepancy index, objective granding system and comprehensive clinical assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. United States; 2005. 434-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.030
13. OCHI C y BEGOLE E. Relationship between index of complexity, outcome and need, dental aesthetic index, peer assessment rating index, and American Board of Orhtodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. United States; 2007. 131:248-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.045
14. LINDA I y OCHI C. Orthodontic treatment complexity and Need in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. Oral Health Dent Manag. United States; 2014.13 (3): 562-7.
15. CONS NC, JENNY J, KOHOUT FJ, SONGPAISAN Y y JOTIKASTIRA D. Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries. J. Public Health Dent. United States; 1989. 49: 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1989.tb02054.x
16. DE OLIVEIRA CM, SHEIHAM A, TSAKOS G y O'BRIEN KD. Oral Health related quality of life and IOTN indexas predictors of children's perceived needs and acceptance far orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J. United Kingdom; 2008. 204(7):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.239
17. JOSEFSSON E, BJERKLIN K y LINDSTEN R. Malocclusion frequency in Swedish and immigrant adolescents influence of origin on orthodontic treatment need, European Journal of Orthodontics. United Kingdom; 2007. 29: 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl054
18. LARSSON B y BERGSTROM K. Adolescents perception of the quality of orthodontic treatment, Scand J Caring Sci. Scandinavia; 2005. 19 (2):95-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00325.x
19. BROOK P y SHAW W. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. United Kingdom; 1989. ll(3):309-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999
20. KOK Y, MAGESON P, HARRADINE N y SPROD A. Comparinga quality of life measure and theAesthetic Componen of the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing orthodontic treatment need and concern. Journal of Orthodontics. United Kingdom; 2004. 31: 312-318. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225020625
21. HUNT O, HEPPER P, JOHNSTON C, STEVENSON M y SURDEN D. The Aesthetic Componen of the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need validated against lay opinion. Eur J Orthod. United Kingdom; 2002. 24 (1): 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.1.53
22. AVILÉS M, HUITZIL E, FERNÁNDEZ M yVIERNA J. Índice de necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico (IOTN). Oral. México; 2011. 39: 782-785.
23. GUTIÉRREZ M, GUTIÉRREZ J, GUTIÉRREZ J y ROJAS A. indice de Necesidad de Tratamiento Ortodóncico (IOTN) en una población de Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. Ortodoncia Actual. México; 2016.12(48):28-32. https://doi.org/10.52428/20756208.v12i30.510
24. CHAPEL ROAD ORTHODONTICS. lndex OfTreatment Need (IOTN) [Internet] [consultado el 22 de agosto de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.chapelroad.co.uk/PDF's/lOTN.pdf
25. CRUZ-LÓPEZ M, GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO M, GUTIÉRREZ-ROJO J y ROJAS-GARCÍA A. Comparación de los índices ICON y el componente estético del IOTN para determinar la necesidad de tratamiento ortodóncico. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia. México; 2017. 5 (1): 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmo.2017.03.020
26. NAKAS N, TIRO A, REDZEPAGIC L, HADZIHASANOVIC y DZEMIDZIC V. Use of orthodontic treatment needs indices far oral health survey. Mater Sociomed. Bosnia Herzegovina; 2016. 28(2): 138-140. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2016.28.138-140
27. MANCCINI M. Necesidad de tratamiento ortodóntico según el índice de necesidad de tratamiento ortodóntico en escolares de 12 a 13 años. Tesis para optar el título de Cirujano Dentista. Lima. 2011: 96.
28. CAMILLERI S y MULLIGAN K. The prevalence of malocclusion in Maltese school children as measured by the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Malta Medica! Journal. Malta; 2007. 19 (1):19-24.
29. CORNEAGA A, DANILA I y BALCOS C. Assessment of Orthodontic treatment needs of schoolchildren from lasi according to index of orthodontic treatment needs (IOTN) and dental aesthetic index (DAI). Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. Romanía; 2011. 3 (4): 27-32.
30. SHARMA J y DHIR R. IOTN-A tool to prioritize treatment need in children and plan health servives. Oral Health Dent Manag. United States; 2014. 13 (1): 65-70.
31. SOL y TANGE. A comparative study using the Occlusal lndex and the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Angle Orhtod. United States; 1993. 63 (1):57-64.
32. BOURNE C y SA B. Orthodontic treatment need of children in Trinidad and Tobago. West lndian Med J. lndian; 2012. 61(2):180-6.
33. MUNGOZIBWA E, KUIJPERS A, A VAN M y KIKWLU E. Perceptions of dental attractiveness and orthodontic treatment need among Tanzanian children. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. United States; 2004. 125 (4):433-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.002
34. FOX N, DANIELS C y GILGRASS T. A comparison of the index of Complexity Outcome and Need (ICON) with the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and the lndex of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). British Dental Journal. United Kingdom; 2002. 193 (4): 225-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801530
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Manuel Del Real Villagrana, Claudia Leticia Flores Carrillo , Jaime Fabián Gutiérrez Rojo y Martha Patricia Guerrero Castellón
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
