Why is the mirage of free, prior and informed consultation in Ecuador not binding?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/12345678.v1i1.1083Keywords:
Consulta previaAbstract
The present work deals with the analysis of the mirage of prior consultation in Ecuador, for which we develop a critical study on the application and effectiveness of this right, in the Ecuadorian constitutional context, from its appearance in the supreme norm, promoting an understanding of the conceptual bases and its importance and implication when prescribing it as a constitutional right. From this analysis we review three fundamental aspects in their environment, that is, the effectiveness, application and its binding aspect in the Ecuadorian legal context, so the answer we try to provide is to the following question: why the prior consultation is not binding?
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JACKSON VICENTE CONDOLO ACARO, ENRIQUE DAVID LUZURIAGA MUÑOZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
