Constitutional Review: Lights and Shadows in Bolivian Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/12345678.v1i1.1088Keywords:
Constitutional StateAbstract
The essence of this research work lies in determining the power assumed by ordinary judges within the framework of their powers, to carry out the control of tutelary constitutionality in the specific cases submitted to their knowledge and thus the scope of said control. For this purpose, the argumentative burden in the work of the ordinary judge constitutes an essential component of his ruling. Beyond assuming respect for the right to have well-founded and/or reasoned resolutions from the defendant, the justification of the decision that must be arrived at through the methods of interpretation proposed by the law and which, to a certain extent, have been developed by the constitutional jurisprudence of Bolivia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 VÍCTOR RICARDO REVOLLO MEDINA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
