Experimental evaluation of purification methods for biogas produced from pig manure in rural biodigesters
Evaluación experimental de métodos de purificación de biogás producido a partir de estiércol de cerdo en biodigestores rurales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/20758944.v19iEspecial.947Keywords:
Biogas, Biogas contaminants, Biogas treatment, Hydrogen sulfide, Carbon dioxideAbstract
Biogas contains a mixture of gases, of whom methane is of the most interest, the rest of the contaminant gases are the product of the activity of microorganisms involved in the anaerobic digestion process. These contaminants limit the use of biogas as a fuel, especially in the generation of electrical energy. The search for alternative technologies for the treatment of biogas is of great interest to promote the use of this renewable energy source. Biogas purification methods make use of chemical and physical processes that generate polluting waste, which must be effectively managed, and the removal of CO2 often requires specialized equipment, limiting this process to industrial scale productions. Activated carbon is effective in removing contaminants but is inaccessible to rural farms due to its cost. Iron sponge is often used in domestic facilities due to the low cost and ease of access, nonetheless this method generates solid wastes that are difficult to dispose of. Commercial copper sulfate can remove hydrogen sulfate but requires adequate pressure conditions to be effective.
Downloads
References
Engineering ToolBox. (2003). Engineering ToolBox. Obtenido de Fuels - Higher and Lower Calorific Values: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fuels-higher-calorific-values-d_169.html
Figueroa, C., Alegría, C., Meza, V., & Quipuzco, L. (2019). Eficiencia de la desulfuración del biogás mediante biofiltración empleando soportes orgánicos. Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.
Garfí, M. M.-H. (2016). Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 60, 599-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071
Giraldo, L., & Moreno-Piraján, J. (2008). Monolitos de carbón activado a partir de cáscara de coco e impregnación con niquel y cobre. Revista Colombiana De Quimica.
Hassan, S., Maher, M., Janna, Q., Kholoud, J., & Eldon. (2020). Removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas using activated carbon synthesized from different locally available biomass wastes - a case study from Palestine.
Herout, M., Malaťák, J., Kučera, L., & Dlabaja, T. (2011). Biogas composition depending on the type of plant biomass used. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 57(4), 137-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/41/2010-RAE
https://doi.org/10.17221/41/2010-RAE
Huertas, J., Quipuzco, L., Hassanein, A., & Lansing, S. (2020). Comparing hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency in a field-scale digester using microaeration and iron filters. Energies, 13(18), 4793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184793
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184793
Marín De Jesus, D. F. (2021). Innovative technologies for biogas upgrading. Universidad de Valladolid.
MHE. (2021). Balance Energetico Nacional. Bolivia: Ministerio de Hidrocarburos y Energia.
Morero, B., Gropelli, E., & Campanella, E. (2010). Revisión de las principales tecnologías de purificación de biogás. Obtenido de Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Palermo: https://dspace.palermo.edu/dspace/handle/10226/1377
Nuntón, S. (2018). Influencia de la temperatura y Ph en el rendimiento de obtención de biogás a partir de bagazo de caña y estiercol de equino mediante un Digestor Batch. Lambayeque, Peru: Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo.
Ortega, L., Bárcenas, L., Fernández, E., & Rodríguez, S. (2015). Principales métodos para la desulfuración del biogás. Ingenieria Hidraulica y Ambiental; ISSN 1680-0338, p. 45 - 56.
Ponce, E. (2016). Métodos sencillos en obtención de biogás rural y su conversión en electricidad. Chile: IDESIA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292016005000011
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292016005000011
Rivero, O. (2009). Biogás en Bolivia, programa "viviendas autoenergéticas" una nueva forma de ver el futuro energético ambiental del país en el área rural. Revista Desarrollo Local Sostenible, 3.
Romat, L., Fernandez, G., Fabrizio, A., & Bargiela, M. (2021). Obtención de biogás a partir de efl uentes porcinos como alternativa de mitigación de emisiones. Revista RedBioLAC, 5(1), 55-59.
Skoog, D., & West, D. (2015). Química Analítica. Santa Fé, México: Cengage Learning.
Suntikunaporn, Echaroj, & Rimpikul. (2014). Evaluation of Agricultural Wastes for Biogas Production. Thammasat International Journal of Science and Technology.
Tornero, A. G., & Ramírez, J. A. (2015). Técnicas para la disminución en la concentración de ácido sulfhídrico en el biogás.
Turco, M., Ausielo, A., & Micoli, L. (2016). Treatment of Biogas for Feeding High Temperature Fuel Cells. Suiza: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03215-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03215-3
Varnero, M. T. (2011). Manual de Biogás. Santiago de Chile: FAO.
Varnero, M., Caru, M., Galleguillos, K., & Achondo, P. (2012). Tecnologías disponibles para la Purificación de Biogás usado en la Generación Eléctrica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642012000200005
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642012000200005
WBA. (2020). Global Bioenergy Statistics 2020. WBA
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Luis Fernando Salazar Del Pozo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.