Comparative study of the kinetic reformation of methane with steam process for obtaining synthesis gas and production of methanol for the based on 5 petrochemical technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52428/20758944.v17i50.18Keywords:
Syngas, Methanol, Autothermal Reforming, Steam methane ReformingAbstract
This study focuses on the analysis of the kinetics of the methane reforming process with steam of five world-renowned technologies to obtaining syngas, true to the production of methanol and defined on two gasification processes: Steam reforming (SMR) and autothermal reforming (ATR). These simulations have been developed with specific information on each patented process, operational data, flow diagrams and others. The five technologies analyzed show that the type of reforming to be used depends on the final product. In methanol case, the ideal stoichiometric composition is called the “M”, this value is calculated by the optimal ratio of the molar fractions between carbon oxides and hydrogen, which must be equal to 2.
The SMR process tends to produce hydrogen in large quantities, unlike the ATR process that produces syngas rich in carbon monoxide, outside of this analysis, other historical factors of the process such as the capacity of the plant, determine its selection: capacities Less than 3000 tons/day, the SMR process is chosen, from 3000-5000 tons/day the Two Step Reforming process (combination of SMR and ATR) is preferable and if the production exceeds 5000 tons/day the ATR process is the best option.
The simulation of each technology and the development of the kinetic conversion models of the reforming reactors were designed for a methane gas flow corresponding to 89% of 68 million standard cubic feet per day (MMSCFD) of natural gas, with an approximate methanol synthesis capacity of 1900 tons/day, 30 MMSCFD recirculation system and carbon dioxide feed modifications.
Downloads
References
Aspentech (2020). About Aspen Tech. Recuperado de: https://www.aspentech.com/en/about-aspentech
Basile, A., Francesco, D. (2018). Methanol Science and engineering. First Edition. Elsevier.
Chauvel, A., Lefebvre, G. (1989). Petrochemical Processes, Synthesis gas derivatives and major hydrocarbons. Editions Technips.
Hiller, H., Reimert, R., Stonner, H.M., (2012). Gas production. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a12_169.pub3
Hougen, O., Watson, K., Ragatz, R. (1978). Principios de los Procesos Químicos. Barcelona España: Editorial Reverte.
Hydrocarbon Processing (2012). Gas Processes Handbook. Houston, TX: Hydrocarbon Processing.
Hydrocarbon Processing (2010). Petrochemical Processes Handbook. Houston, TX: Hydrocarbon Processing.
Juan, R., Laborde, M., Gozalez, P., Ayastuy, J., Gutierrez, M. (1994). Transformación Catalítica del gas natural a gas de síntesis. CIT Información Tecnológica.
Moulijn, J., Makkee, M., Van Diepen, A. (2013). Chemical Process Technology. Second Edition. Netherlands; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Nielsen, J., Nielsen, T. (2001). Large-scale Hydrogen Production. CATTECH, 6, 150–159 (2002)https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020163012266
Nielsen, R., Christiansen, L. (2011). Concepts in syngas manufacture. Catalytic Science series- Vol 10. Covent Garden; London: Imperial College Press. https://doi.org/10.1142/p717
Petersen, A., Dybkjaer, I., Ovensen, V., Schjodt, C., Sehested, J., Thompsen, G. (2011). Natural gas to synthesis gas- Catalyst and catalytic Processes. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 3(2), 423-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2011.03.004
Reimert, R., Marschner, F., Renner, H.J., Boll, W., Supp, E., Brejc, M., Liebner, W., Schaub G., (2011).’’ Gas Production, 2. Processes’’. Doi: 10.1002/14356007.o12_o01
ThyssenKrupp (2017). Hydrogen-Key-to-any-Refinery. Recuperado de: https://www.thyssenkrupp-industrial-solutions.com/
Villar, J. (2016). Oxidación parcial de metano sobre catalizadores NiAl2O4/CeO2. Universidad de País del Vasco, España.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martha Liliana Siles Camacho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.